Everything about Reactionary totally explained
Reactionary (or
reactionist) is a political epithet, generally used as a
pejorative, originally applied in the context of the
French Revolution to
counter-revolutionaries who wished to restore the real or imagined conditions of the
monarchical Ancien Régime. Through the 19th century,
reactionism was used to refer to those who wished to preserve
feudalism or
aristocratic privilege against
industrialism,
republicanism,
liberalism, and in some cases
socialism.
Later on in the early 20th century, the term also came to describe those favouring a stronger role of the
Catholic Church in society.
Etymology and history
Reactionary comes from the
French word
réactionnaire, coined in the early 19th century. It was the first of the two words coined (the other being
conservative, from the
French word
conservateur) for the opposition to the
French Revolution. "In parliamentary usage, the monarchists were commonly referred to as the
Right, although they were often called Reactionaries." This is the first time the word was used to mean "A movement towards the reversal of an existing tendency or state" or a "return to a previous condition of affairs."
The earliest English-language use cited in the
OED is by
John Stuart Mill in 1840: "The philosophers of the reactionary school—of the school to which
Coleridge belongs."
In the 19th century this term was used against individuals and groups that idealized either
feudalism or the pre-modern era that preceded the
Industrial Revolution and the
French Revolution when economies were largely
agrarian, the
landed aristocracy dominated society, a
king was on the throne and the church was the moral centre of society. Thus, those labeled reactionary once favoured the
aristocracy over the
middle class and the
working class, even though they later favoured the conservative
bourgeoisie---they were against democracy and parliamentarism.
the term 'reactionary tories' is also applicable to the Tory government from 1815-22 in England. The 'reactionary' tory government aimed to ensure autocratic and landed class supremacy. The most famous contribution of the Reactionary Tories was the introduction of the Corn Laws which imposed a high tariff on Imports with the aim of encouraging middle class workers to buy British goods. However, the corn laws did just the opposite and the major food group of the British people (bread) was too expensive to buy. This resulted in starvation for the working class.
Meanings of reactionary in particular contexts
In
Marxist terminology, reactionary is generally used with a
pejorative meaning to refer to people whose ideas might appear pro-
working class but in essence contain elements of
feudalism,
capitalism,
nationalism,
fascism, or other
ruling class characteristics.
The term reaction appeared in Europe during the
French Revolution, when conservative, and especially
Catholic, forces organized to oppose the changes brought by the revolution and to fight to preserve the authority of the
Church and
Crown. Reaction was especially opposed to the most radical tendencies such as
Jacobinism.
In the context of 19th century European politics, the reactionary class were the Roman Catholic hierarchy (namely the
clergy), the
aristocracy,
royal families and
royalists and all those who supported traditional
monarchies and the involvement of the Catholic church in government. In France, those who supported traditional rule under the direct heirs of the
Bourbon dynasty were called the
legitimist reaction. At the time of the
Third Republic, the monarchists were the reactionary faction which was later changed to a much milder term of Conservative. Furthermore, the revolution set precedents in undermining (or even completely eliminating) the power of the aristocracy through the confiscation of feudal estates. Under the liberal monarchists of 1789, some of the vast estates of the clergy and aristocracy were confiscated; in 1793, the process continued with the estates of condemned nobles; and in 1797, the egalitarians of the Conspiracy of
François-Noël Babeuf experimented with the abolition of land ownership in some parts of France. The revolutionary slogan of "
Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité" wasn't an empty embellishment but the essence of Enlightenment philosophy; that of
secularization,
egalitarianism,
classlessness and
democracy, which motivated the masses to action on the barricades.
The French Revolution was a political and a social revolution. It was political in the sense that it changed the form of government from an
absolute monarchy into a
democratic republic. It was social in the sense that it sought to reform society, in areas such as religion, education and law.
Thermidorian Reaction
The
Thermidorian Reaction was a movement within the revolution, against the excesses of the
Jacobins. On July 27, 1794 (9 Thermidor year II in the
French Republican Calendar),
Maximilien Robespierre's
Reign of Terror was brought to an end.
The overthrow of Robespierre signalled the reassertion of the French
National Convention over the
Committee of Public Safety. The Jacobins were repressed, the prisons were emptied and the Committee was shorn of its powers. After the execution of some 104 Robespierre supporters, the Thermidorian Reaction stopped the use of the guillotine against alleged counterrevolutionaries, set a middle course between the monarchists and the radicals and ushered in a time of relative exuberance and its accompanying corruption. The Thermidorian Reaction was thus not
reactionary in the more common sense of the term.
The Restored French Monarchy
With the
Congress of Vienna, the monarchs of
Russia,
Prussia, and
Austria formed the
Holy Alliance, a form of collective security against
revolution and
Bonapartism inspired by Tsar
Alexander I of Russia. This instance of reaction was surpassed by a movement that developed in France when, after the second fall of
Napoleon, the
Restauration, or re-instatement of the
Bourbon dynasty, ensued. This time it was to be a
constitutional monarchy, with an
elected lower house of parliament, the Chamber of Deputies. The Franchise was restricted to men over the age of
forty, which indicated that for the first fifteen years of their lives they'd lived under the
ancien régime. Nevertheless, King
Louis XVIII was worried that he'd still suffer an intractable parliament. He was delighted with the
ultra-royalists, or Ultras, whom the election returned, declaring that he'd found a
chambre introuvable, literally, a "house of government for which the like can't be found". But later he realized that they were too ultra for a royal.
It was the Declaration of Saint-Ouen which had prepared the way for the Restoration. Upon landing in France, the future Louis XVIII stated most notably that the lands of the aristocrats who fled, and which the Republic had sold at auction, were not to be confiscated nor was restitution to be given. Further, that the
Napoleonic Code of Law was to remain in force, that the awards and social function of the
Legion of Honor given to those loyal to Napoleon wasn't to be abolished, and that Napoleon's changes to the educational system, most notably the University of Paris, would remain. It was the desire to restore all these issues to their pre-revolutionary conditions that most dramatically defined a reactionary. And many of the Ultras held these notions, thus becoming far more reactionary than the King's own policies.
Before the French Revolution, which radically and bloodily overthrew most aspects of French society's organization, the only way that constitutional change could be instituted was by referring it to old legal documents that could be interpreted as agreeing with the proposal. Everything new had to be expressed as a righteous revival of something old that had lapsed and had been forgotten. This was also the means used for diminished aristocrats to get themselves a bigger piece of the pie. In the eighteenth century, those gentry whose fortunes had so diminished that they lived at the level of peasants went skulking for every ancient feudal law that would give them a little something. The "ban," for example, meant that all their peasants had to grind their grain in the lord's mill. So they came to the
French States-General of 1789 fully prepared to press for the expansion of such practices in all provinces, to the legal limit. They were horrified when the French Revolution permitted common citizens to go hunting, one of the few advantages that they'd always maintained everywhere.
Thus with the restoration of the Bourbons, the Chambre Introuvable set about reverting every law to return things not merely to the age of the
absolute monarchy, but before that to the age in which the aristocracy really was a socially powerful class. It is this which clearly distinguishes a "reactionary" from a "conservative." The conservative would have accepted many improvements brought about by the revolution, and simply refused a program of wholesale
reversion. Hence one should be wary of the use of the word "reactionary" in later days as a political slur, since there's nothing to compare with the Chambre Introuvable in other countries. For example, Russia certainly didn't have any such aristocrats after 1989.
Later French kings similarly had trouble with their parliaments.
The clerical philosophers
In the aftermath of the French Revolution, the French state was in constant turmoil between the forces on
restoration of the right and revolutionaries on the left. Herein arose the clerical philosophers
Joseph de Maistre,
Louis de Bonald, and
François-René de Chateaubriand, whose solution was to restore the former
absolute monarchy and reinstall the
Roman Catholic Church as a state church. This pattern of thought was to become recurrent in French reactionaries, who generally long for a pre-Revolutionary Golden Age and wish to repudiate the two centuries of changes after the Revolution (see
Action Française).
De Maistre became famous as the philosopher of reaction during the
Restoration. His writings were the authoritative sources of reactionary ideas. Holding to a pessimistic view of human nature, he repudiated the principles of the French Revolution and its political and social institutions for they originated in what he saw as the anti-Christian
Enlightenment. According to him, it was
God that created the state and not a
social contract; order and stability were paramount in a society and this could only come about by obedience to an absolute monarchy and the
Roman Catholic Church; law was the expression of the customs and traditions not the fickle opinion of the people. He defended authoritarian government, a hierarchical social order based on natural inequality. In the book,
L 'Examen de la philosophie de Bacon, he attacked Bacon's
materialism.
De Bonald was of the same cloth as De Maistre but not as talented. In a sense, he only buttressed the convictions of already convinced reactionaries. Attacking the French Revolution as creating
individualism and
centralization in government, he championed the cause of absolute monarchy and the Catholic Church as the only means of securing tranquillity. De Bonald proposed restoring the medieval
guilds as a way of ensuring the rights of all classes.
Chateaubriand was an eloquent writer. So much so that he was described as a
Rousseau in Catholic dress; he's often considered the first
Romantic writer. He wasn't a reactionary per se; he accepted the changes brought by the revolution but not the revolutionary principles. He thought to mingle the new institutions with the old memories, traditions and ideals of the
ancien regime. By enveloping the Restoration in Catholic trappings, he sought to give the
Bourbon regime stability and devotion of the people. Chateaubriand wrote novels (such as
Atala) with Christian themes and the
Genie du Christianisme, among others.
These men advanced and promoted Catholicism without necessarily adhering themselves to its teaching, in an attitude that will be later reflected by
Charles Maurras, an agnostic who supported Catholic clericalism. They saw the Catholic Church as essential in maintaining a conservative social order and the monarchy. They mark out the beginning of the mentality of reaction to the liberalizing forces of modernity and democracy.
Metternich and containment
The unleashing of democratic forces and ideas of the French Revolution had far-reaching consequences which threatened the established order of monarchical governments and promoted social unrest everywhere. Reaction set in against
republican and
liberal forces.
During the period of 1815-1848,
Prince Metternich, the
foreign minister of the
Austrian Empire, stepped in to organize containment of revolutionary forces through international alliances meant to prevent the spread of revolutionary fervour. At the
Congress of Vienna, he was very influential in establishing the new order, the
Concert of Europe, after the overthrow of
Napoleon.
After the Congress, Prince Metternich worked hard bolstering and stabilizing the conservative regime of the Restoration period. He worked furiously to prevent Russia's Tsar
Alexander I (who aided the liberal forces in Germany, Italy and France) from gaining influence in Europe. The Church was his principal ally, promoting it as a conservative principle of order while opposing democratic and liberal tendencies within the Church. His basic philosophy was based on
Edmund Burke who championed the need for old roots and an orderly development of society. He opposed democratic and
parliamentary institutions but favoured modernizing existing structures by gradual
reform. Despite Metternich's efforts a series of
revolutions rocked Europe in 1848.
Late 19th and 20th century
In Western Europe in the 19th century,
liberals sought to create representative, very
secular regimes in the place of monarchies, which were considered undemocratic, and which had often been influenced by the Roman Catholic Church's teachings and clergy. Events such as the French Revolution brought dramatic changes in that respect. The reactionaries were thus those who wished for a Restoration of the
ancien regime, namely, parts of the aristocracy, the Catholics (often farmers and rural middle class) and the royalists, often lumped together in the "alliance of the Throne and the Altar".
In
France, at the beginnings of the
Third Republic, the parliamentary
left-wing consisted of the
Republicans and the
right-wing of the royalists, roughly speaking. "Reactionary", "conservative", "right-wing" and "royalist" were thus almost synonymous. In reaction to the alliance of monarchist and clerical forces (the latter wanting a major official role and influence for the Church), strong feelings of
anti-clericalism flared out at the left-wing. In 1905 the
liberal left-wing government decreed the confiscation of all Church property in
France, expelled all
religious orders, despite the massive opposition of the Catholic citizens, especially in rural areas.
Reactionary feelings were often coupled with an hostility to modern, industrial means of production and a nostalgia for a more rural society. The
Vichy regime in
France,
Francisco Franco's regime, the
Salazar regime in
Portugal, and Maurras's
Action Française political movements are examples of such traditional reactionary feelings, in favour of
authoritarian regimes with strong unelected leaders and with Catholicism as a
state religion. As an example, the
motto of Vichy France was
travail, famille, patrie ("work, family, homeland") and its leader,
Marshal Philippe Pétain, declared that
la terre, elle ne ment pas ("earth doesn't lie") in an indication of his belief that the truest life is rural and agrarian.
Fascism is generally considered to be reactionary due to its glorification of ancient national history and some of the social arrangements prior to the
Industrial Revolution of the 19th century. The Italian fascists showed a desire to bring about a new social order based on the ancient feudal principle of delegation (though without serfdom) in their enthusiasm for the
corporate state. Mussolini also said that "fascism is reaction" and "Fascism, which didn't fear to call itself reactionary ...has not today any impediment against declaring itself illiberal and anti-liberal."
However, Gentile and Mussolini also attacked reactionary policies, particularly monarchism and - more veiled - some aspects of Italian conservative
Catholicism. They wrote "History doesn't travel backwards. The
fascist doctrine hasn't taken De Maistre as its prophet. Monarchical absolutism is of the past, and so is ecclesiolatry." They further elaborated in the political doctrine that fascism "is not reactionary [inthe old way] but revolutionary". Conversely, they also explained that fascism was of the "right", not of the "left". Fascism was certainly not simply a return to tradition: it carried the centralised state beyond even what had been seen in
absolute monarchies—fascist
single-party states were as centralised as most
communist states—and fascism's intense
nationalism was certainly something not to be found in the period prior to the
French Revolution. The spirit of
Hegel's total philosophy was opposed to a return to a
Christian-based society, stressing instead the role of the
State.
The
Nazis also certainly didn't consider themselves "reactionary" and in fact numbered the forces of "reaction" (Prussian
monarchists, nobility,
Roman Catholics) among their enemies right next to their "
Red Front" enemies (
communists) in the Nazi party march
Die Fahne hoch. The fact that the Nazis called their 1933 rise to power the
National Revolution, already tells that they ideologically detested the opposition to state revolutions from the clerical side. Nevertheless, the idealization of tradition, folklore, classical thought, leadership (as exemplified by
Frederick the Great), their rejection of the liberalism of the Weimar Republic, and calling the German state the “Third Reich” (which traces back to the medieval
First Reich and the pre-Weimar
Second Reich) has led many to regard the Nazis as reactionary.
Those
Clericalist movements sometimes labeled as
Clerical Fascists by their critics, can be considered reactionaries in terms of the 19th century, since they share some elements of
Fascism, while at the same time a return to the pre-revolutionary model of social relations, with a strong role for the Church. Their utmost philosopher was
Nicolás Gómez Dávila.
Occurrences of the word reactionary
- "For the Bentham group Burke finally represented sheer reactionism".
"The philosophers of the reactionary school — of the school to which Coleridge belongs."
"The French aristocrats became hopelessly reactionary and lent a willing ear to every plot, to every scheme, to every suggestion to overthrow the unconstitutional system established by the Charte, in order to restore the Old Regime."
"Such men regarded Socrates' attacks upon the choice of officials by lot (which then obtained in Athens) as reactionary, even dangerous to the republic."
"If belief in the old-fashioned virtues of self-reliance, thrift, government economy, of a balanced budget, of a stable currency, of fidelity of government to its obligations is reactionary, then you should be reactionary."
"Goods prohibited to import: weapons, ammunition, explosives, military technical equipment, drugs, toxic chemicals, debauched and reactionary products..."
"At the same time it must be emphasized that the Church, with all her "reactionary", royalist, personalistic and clerical aspects, was the strongest stumbling-block to the victory of National Socialism."
"We again renamed it, this time Raja’iyah Airfield (that is, 'Reactionary,' a favorite pejorative term used by the 'progressive' Arab regimes at the time). The airfield served us and the Jordanians very well." Norvell B. DeAtkine, formerly U.S. envoy to Jordan, in a recent memoir about the U.S. embassy there c. 1970.
"It is up to us to organize the people. As for the reactionaries in China, it's up to us to organize the people to overthrow them. Everything 'Reactionary' is the same; if you don't hit it, it won't fall. This is also like sweeping the floor; as a rule, where the broom doesn't reach, the dust won't vanish of itself."
"That was the chief of police of Malibu. A real reactionary."
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn writes that the perfect Roman Catholic "programme" is the Spanish saying: » ::Tener un hijo
Plantar un árbol
Escribir un libro
("To have a son, to plant a tree, to write a book") is the perfect "reactionary" pattern; a synthesis of patriarchalism, agriculture and artistry.
This saying also has the merit of illuminating the critical differences between reactionaries in a strict sense and advocates of capitalism (who may, in certain circumstances, become their allies). To capitalism, agriculture isn't a matter of "planting a tree" because it makes one's estate look prettier, gives the children some shade, or in general represents part of a way of life. Agriculture under capitalism is a matter of mass production, sophisticated technology, and standardized futures contracts traded at commodity exchanges. Orange trees are planted when the orange concentrate futures market gives that signal -- an attitude anathema to reactionaries.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Reactionary'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://reactionary.totallyexplained.com">Reactionary Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
